Team & Board

The people behind the standard.

Our board's independent judgment is the credibility. It's not optional — it's the mechanism that makes this giving model work.

Note: Board of Directors names below are still placeholder. Replace with real board members before launch. Executive team is confirmed.

Operations & programs.

The staff who run day-to-day operations, manage donor relationships, and oversee project reporting.

SC

Somak Chattopadhyay

President

[Bio to be added.]

BP

Biplab Pal

Secretary

[Bio to be added.]

AM

Anirban Majumdar

Treasurer

[Bio to be added.]

Independent judgment. That's the model.

Our board, not our donors, decides what we fund — applying our five-point standard to every project. An independent board is both a legal requirement and the foundation of donor trust.

SB

[Dr. Sanjay Banerjee]

Board Chair

[Physician / public-health background.] [Bio to be confirmed.]

PD

[Priya Desai]

Treasurer

[Finance / nonprofit governance background.] [Bio to be confirmed.]

AM

[Anil Mukherjee]

Secretary

[Diaspora community / philanthropy background.] [Bio to be confirmed.]

Why an independent board matters: Our board members are not the same people as our executive staff. For a grant-making charity, independent board judgment is part of both the credibility and the legal posture. Donors support the mission and may express a preference — the board decides what gets funded.

How decisions get made.

The executive team sources and evaluates projects, then presents recommendations to the board. The board applies the five-point standard and makes final funding decisions.

Donors may express a preference for a featured project when they give. But giving does not create a binding earmark — that's both a legal requirement and a feature of the model. An independent board applying a published standard is what makes this giving vehicle trustworthy.

Read our five-point standard →